First Long Island Investors, LLC was honored to host Dr. Meena Bose, Chair of Presidential Studies at Hofstra University, at the Garden City Hotel on October 30th for our semi-annual Thought Leadership Breakfast. Dr. Bose is the author of “Shaping and Signaling Presidential Policy: The National Security Decision Making of Eisenhower and Kennedy”, and the editor of several volumes in presidential studies.
The discussion, which focused on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, began with Dr. Bose providing context surrounding the current political climate of the United States. She discussed how the country is more divided than ever and faces a multitude of challenges, making the 2024 election highly consequential. Dr. Bose noted that it is not just the presidential election that will impact America; the House and Senate elections will also shape the future of our country. The composition of these two legislative branches will be crucial in determining policy moving forward.
Dr. Bose drew parallels to the 2016 election and compared former President Trump’s positions then and now. Although former President Trump was considered an underdog in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, Dr. Bose emphasized that the 2016 race offered a more apt comparison for 2024 due to the significant impact the COVID-19 pandemic had on the 2020 election.
At the time of the 2016 election, various factors seemed to point to Hillary Clinton’s victory, including national polls, the candidates perceived political leadership qualities, party support, fundraising success, and overall public opinion. However, Dr. Bose pointed out that a crucial shift in voter support within Democratic-leaning states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin was not adequately recognized. This oversight contributed to Trump’s ultimate victory in 2016, despite Clinton’s favorability by many metrics.
Looking ahead to the 2024 election, Dr. Bose underscored that the outcome will hinge on the performance of the swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The deciding factor for voters in these battleground states, she suggested, will be the issues they prioritize most – namely the economy, immigration, foreign policy, and reproductive rights.
Dr. Bose pointed out that former President Trump seems to be performing better in polls compared to his previous campaigns against Clinton and Biden, despite being behind nationally in those races. Dr. Bose referenced two methods for predicting the election winner that historically have had very high success rates. The first method is Nate Silver’s data-driven approach, which at the time pointed to former President Trump having a slight edge over Vice President Harris. The second method was created by Allan Lichtman, who has correctly predicted nine of the last ten presidential elections using his “13 keys” system. This approach focuses on the political landscape and the incumbent party’s performance rather than on polling or other conventional metrics. According to Lichtman’s model, the candidate who wins the majority of the thirteen keys is likely to prevail in the election. Lichtman’s method predicted Vice President Harris as the winner. The voters have since spoken, and we now know the outcome of the election. Hopefully, the country can come together and work towards a brighter future.
“Our portfolio doesn’t depend on our being right about the twists and turns of the economy. It depends on our understanding the prospects for our companies and what is discounted in their share prices.”
Bill Miller
Our investment strategies delivered positive returns in the third quarter, with all of our Security, Defensive, and Traditional Equity strategies posting gains. Our flagship Dividend Growth strategy led the way during the quarter, advancing 10.1% net of fees and expenses. Year-to-date, all of these strategies have generated meaningful positive returns.
We are also seeing promising traction with our exposure to specific real estate lending investments primarily in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania; Austin, Texas; and parts of Florida. These gains have been achieved despite difficult geopolitical and domestic political environments.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine and escalating tensions in the Middle East continue to impact markets. Domestically, the political climate has grown increasingly heated, with contentious Presidential, Senate, and House races between Democrats and Republicans. The rhetoric from all levels of the federal government has intensified, with debates, a bombardment of media campaigns, and rallies targeting voters nationwide.
Despite the angst fueled by ongoing wars and domestic political drama, we believe earnings and interest rates played key roles in the gains mentioned above. Declining inflation (Chart 1), growing gross domestic product (Chart 2), and declining short-term interest rates (Chart 3) also were, in large part, responsible for these strong results.
The previous charts illustrate what some describe as a “soft landing,” where inflation continues to ease while economic activity sustains growth with a moderate slowdown. We do not, however, see a recession in the foreseeable future. Also, in our opinion, declining inflation and lower interest rates contribute to stock market valuations remaining at reasonable, although not cheap, levels. Chart 4 depicts what we believe are reasonable levels for the stock market, as represented by both the S&P 500 Index (market-cap weighted) and the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index:
For the soft landing to occur and valuations for equities to remain at reasonable levels, corporate earnings must continue to grow. We believe this to be the case with large-capitalization, mid-cap, and small-cap companies. As an aside, our suggestion in the last quarterly letter that small-cap and more value-oriented strategies would rally played out in the third quarter. International investments also demonstrated impressive signs of life.
Chart 5 reflects Wall Street consensus expectations for earnings growth of the S&P 500 Index in the coming year. If the earnings come in as forecast, this is particularly noteworthy as it suggests that the market, as a whole, is not overvalued in our opinion:
Chart 5 shows consensus projections for strong earnings growth in 2025 compared to 2024. While we anticipate earnings growth next year, we believe this projected gain is overly optimistic. In our view, this projection will come down over time, reflecting factors such as decreased consumer demand, uncertainty from a new administration as well as continued geopolitical strife, but we still expect reasonable earnings growth next year. This will require more scrutiny on a company-by-company basis, making it a stock picker’s market across all market capitalizations. In our view, the performance of individual companies, driven by their specific earnings growth, will be the primary differentiator. The rising tide probably will not lift all companies equally.
The backdrop to cautious optimism in our Security, Defensive, and Traditional Equity strategies is a slowly growing economy, decreasing inflation, falling short-term interest rates, and the absence of an imminent recession (which we do not foresee until late 2025 or later). We anticipate that companies delivering earnings growth in a declining interest rate environment should appreciate in line with their earnings growth. In the case of our Dividend Growth strategy, we anticipate appreciation in line with projected dividend growth of at least 7%, which should be well above the anticipated inflation rate. That being said, it is difficult to fully predict the impact of AI on numerous companies, including those that have less obvious ties to technology.
The charts above support our cautious optimism, which is justified by this dynamic combination of earnings growth and a supportive environment that will benefit equities, as well as real estate. We believe real estate will particularly benefit from a slower-growing economy accompanied by declining short-term interest rates.
A final piece of the economic growth puzzle is employment. It is clear to us that employment has somewhat weakened this year. While still relatively strong with an unemployment rate of 4.1%, this does reflect an increase from the recent low of 3.4% in April 2023. There is a theory (the so-called Sahm rule), which states that when the three-month moving average of the unemployment rate rises by 0.5% or more from the lowest three-month average over the previous twelve months, the economy is entering a recession. Although this rule was recently triggered, we, and the rule’s namesake, do not believe it necessarily applies given the current unique economic situation we are facing. Currently, consumers continue to spend more on average, with wage gains for many outpacing inflation. The following two charts illustrate the recent record on unemployment and consumer spending:
Considering various economic factors (including earnings, employment, inflation, and interest rates), we believe that investing for the long term is still reasonable although not inexpensive. That said, there has been a notable rotation within the equity markets. Value-oriented companies such as our dividend growers, rallied in the third quarter as did small-cap companies across both growth and value. The Magnificent Seven had comparatively mixed results in the third quarter despite putting up by and large strong earnings. We anticipate these trends might continue in the fourth quarter. This reinforces our longstanding view that our clients should maintain diversified portfolios with exposure extending well beyond the Magnificent Seven.
The Election
One cannot avoid the vitriol of this election cycle. It is unique in American politics to see a sitting President well into the election cycle bow out. It appears, in our opinion, that concerns over his mental acuity and negative polling contributed to his decision. The Vice President was anointed to replace President Biden without a primary process. Her opponent is former President Trump who has contested the outcome of the previous election.
The country seems equally divided, suggesting this could be a very close election. Additionally, both the Senate and the House are contested, with the outcome of these races carrying significant implications. The views articulated by Vice President Harris and former President Trump on tax, economic, social, and foreign policy issues are quite divergent. The party in control of both houses, if any, will dictate the trajectory of legislation. Otherwise they will be forced to “play” in the same sandbox.
Several tax proposals are critical to our clients, particularly those impacting income tax and estate planning. The changes to individual income tax rates and estate tax exemptions that were part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 enacted by former President Trump are set to expire at the end of 2025, which will affect both tax and estate planning. Clarity is needed to reduce confusion and allow taxpayers to plan for the future.
Vice President Harris has proposed increasing taxes on certain tax payers (both corporate and individual) on income, estates, capital gains, and corporate earnings. She has also floated the concept of tax on “unrealized capital gains.” We view these proposals as potentially negative to long-term investors.
Former President Trump, on the other hand, has proposed a series of tax reductions. While they sound appealing (no federal income tax on tips or social security, liberalization of the SALT deduction, and reduced corporate tax), implementing all of them could lead to large federal deficits and increase our already high national debt.
All of these proposals are speculative and contingent on the outcomes of the Presidential, House, and Senate elections. These elections are extremely consequential given the divergence in economic ideology. Long-term investors should pay close attention, and we will keep you apprised.
Adding to this complexity is the expected increase in liquidity coming from both fiscal and monetary policy in early 2025. This could be positive for equity markets and the economy in general. The Fed may stop its quantitative tapering, and funds in the government’s general account may be released. We will continue to monitor these developments and their potential impact on our investment strategies.
What to do?
As stated, we delivered very good results in the third quarter, and year-to-date performance is quite solid. We have almost made up all the loss from 2022 and then some, depending on the strategy. Being patient and focusing on long-term investing has paid off. Our continued guidance to maintain diversification still makes sense. The recent outperformance by value stocks and small-cap stocks, while the Magnificent Seven have slowed, has brought happiness to a larger segment of investors. This recent appreciation in value stocks has helped our Dividend Growth strategy, while the improvement in smaller-capitalization stocks and international strategies have helped other strategies, which have meaningful allocations to both value and smaller-caps along with allocations to more growth-oriented strategies.
We continue to advise clients to maintain allocations to our “bookend” strategy of rapidly growing companies on one hand and dividend growing companies on the other hand, as well as exposure to small and mid-cap companies. At the same time, our allocation to high-quality, slightly longer duration fixed income, implemented over the last year, is also appropriate for clients. We also continue to recommend select alternative strategies where appropriate.
Given the world we live in as investors, some volatility should be expected. The potential for a lengthy longshoreman strike at major ports in 2025 could be consequential and disruptive, following a short strike the first few days of October. Ongoing foreign wars and the acrimony surrounding the upcoming election (where roughly 51% will be happy and 49% unhappy) could cause investor angst as we wait to see what this all means for the future.
At FLI, our approach is to examine each investment through the lens of earnings growth, dividend growth, valuation, and for our alternative investments, economic opportunity. This disciplined course will help us navigate any twists and turns the economy, geopolitics, and domestic politics may throw at us! This approach has served us well for 41 years and is reflected in the opening quote.
Of course, despite our cautious optimism, we encourage you to call upon any of the members of our investment and wealth management committees should you have questions or concerns.
Finally, please join us at our next Thought Leadership Breakfast seminar on Wednesday, October 30th. Our keynote speaker is Meena Bose, a renowned political science professor at Hofstra University, who will provide an insightful assessment of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.
Also, be on the lookout for our revamped website later this year, and please come visit us to see our newly renovated offices.
“The best way to measure your investing success is not by whether you’re beating the market but by whether you’ve put in place a financial plan and a behavioral discipline that are likely to get you where you want to go.”
– Benjamin Graham
The first six months of the year have resulted in reasonable gains for our clients who adopted FLI’s philosophy of investing in different asset classes and having a prudent, customized asset allocation. This diversification permitted our typical client to be exposed to what worked in the first half of the year, which was predominantly “growth shares.” Many of our clients also benefitted from exposure to the disruptive technology of artificial intelligence (AI). Specifically, once again, equity market appreciation has been biased to large-cap growth shares led by several companies (predominantly NVIDIA). At the same time, large-cap value-oriented companies, many paying dividends, were somewhat left in the dust. This is a pattern that began last year, which rewarded investors in the large-cap growth index as it trounced the large-cap value index.
The phenomena of a handful of super large Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary companies driving markets forward resulted in a bifurcation between the S&P 500 Index (market cap weighted) versus the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index.
In other words, if you were exposed to NVIDIA, Microsoft, Alphabet, Eli Lilly, Meta Platforms, Amazon.com, and several others, you enjoyed significant returns for the past six months. In particular, Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, and Alphabet are responsible for over 52%of the S&P 500 Index return through the first half of the year. If you were predominantly exposed to value-type companies, those primarily paying and growing dividends, which were not talking up the AI phenomenon, your returns were meager or modestly down in the second quarter. Our discipline at FLI is to try to expose our clients to both styles through our defensive and traditional equity baskets. Both baskets include strategies that expose our clients to both NVIDIA and other technology-oriented companies, while bookending that exposure with more traditional value-oriented companies, particularly those that grow
dividends on an annual basis and have fundamental balance sheet strength. We typically also include a modest exposure to fixed income, which for our clients was modestly higher over the first six months but provided a reasonable rate of interest and ballast to our overall investment plans.
This approach takes into consideration numerous current factors including:
We do not anticipate a recession in the next twelve months. GDP growth should be in the 2% range.
We expect inflation to continue to modestly and slowly abate.
We believe that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates higher for longer, but do expect one interest rate reduction later this year or possibly two.
Geopolitical turmoil will continue and could possibly get worse.
Domestic political uncertainty has just increased with the first Presidential debate and President Biden deciding not to run for re-election. We could be in uncharted political waters, and we are in an important election cycle with significant economic policy consequences.
Earnings for the S&P 500 Index companies remain reasonably good, led by technology-oriented companies.
Employment remains robust with the unemployment rate around 4%.
Embedded inflation from the last three years remains a headwind for a portion of the U.S. population. This is impacting consumer behavior and affecting a number of consumer-oriented companies, at least in the short term.
Given this mixed bag of economic and political factors, sticking with a long-term asset allocation that attempts to navigate these uncertain waters continues to make sense to us. Growth shares are trading at somewhat high multiples as evidenced by the cap weighted S&P 500 Index (however nothing like growth companies in 2000). Value companies, which drag down the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index, seem like bargains but do not possess the growth in earnings that leading technology-oriented companies continue to demonstrate. Dividends and annual dividend growth seem to be out of favor for now, but we expect these types of companies will contribute decent performance over the long term as they have in the past. Small-cap companies have gone basically nowhere, either growth oriented or more value oriented (year-to-date the Russell 2000 Index is up a meager 1.7%). This area does present an opportunity as expressed by one of our small-cap outside managers in a recent meeting.
In the commercial real estate arena, higher interest rates and distress in office buildings has led to dismal results as measured by the REIT index. The exception probably is in real estate related to data centers, which are being gobbled up by large technology-oriented companies. The residential real estate market has been impacted by high mortgage rates and higher home prices, resulting in a lack of supply. (In our opinion, many do not want to give up a low mortgage rate on an existing home to move and secure a loan at a much higher rate.) Affordability is becoming an issue for some new home buyers.
As of this writing, the uncertainty and lack of popularity of the two apparent candidates for President may present some volatility going forward. This, coupled with two raging wars, provides for further uncertainty. On the other hand, growing earnings and high employment while inflation slows down provides some optimism. The ultimate impact in terms of earnings growth from the expansion of AI usage also represents a growth opportunity for corporate earnings. As stated, however, the happiness thus far in equity markets has not broadened out and seems to favor, for the most part, the leading large technology-oriented companies. Not the best situation for all investors. When this will change typically depends on when we face a recession; potential tax law changes impacting economic growth favorably or unfavorably; and, of course, the actions of the Federal Reserve.
All of our strategies in the defensive and traditional equity baskets have appreciated thus far this year. As stated previously, those with greater exposure to large technology-oriented companies fared decisively better. Having said that, it appears valuations favor a tilt towards more value-oriented companies. The growth bias can continue given the unknown horizon for AI-oriented companies. Whereas the prospective multiple on earnings for the S&P 500 Index for 2025 feels somewhat high, it should be remembered that the makeup of the S&P has changed dramatically over the past 35 years. There are more growth-oriented, innovative, technology-oriented companies and much less smoke stack or industrial companies. These, asset light and technology heavy companies trade at a higher price-to-earnings ratio.
We have shaved some of the big technology-oriented companies over the quarter. Most notably NVIDIA, which is still a major holding in several of our strategies as it has appreciated 150% year-to-date. Our dividend-oriented strategy, which has modestly appreciated for the first two quarters, has seen dividend growth on average of 7.3% so far this year with 67% of the companies
thus far reporting dividend increases (the strategy was slightly negative for the second quarter). This average dividend increase is more than twice the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation rate.
The second half of the year and beyond represents some challenges, but markets typically climb a wall of worry. The election is in November, and its outcome could affect tax policy in the coming years. The two wars present potential volatility given the uncertainty of possible escalation. The direction of inflation during the balance of the year will be instrumental in the interest rate policy of the Federal Reserve. Should inflation not abate sufficiently to move the Fed to decrease short term rates, this could result in equity market disappointment. Also, at some point both investors and the government should consider our federal debt as it approaches $35 trillion and the interest burden crowds out worthy government investment. Fiscal sanity needs to prevail going forward to stem annual deficits and our total debt.
Where does all of this leave us as investors? As the opening quote states, we need a plan not predicated on “beating” the markets, but a sane path to growing our wealth in a compounding way. This can only be achieved, in our opinion, by avoiding substantial losses through smart diversification, and bookending the majority of our asset allocation among growth and value-oriented equity strategies. In addition, quality fixed income, private real estate, and some possible alternative strategies can also contribute to the prudent diversification we feel is needed to navigate uncertainty over the longer term. Of course, we customize asset allocations for each client depending on their personal circumstances and long-term goals.
Enjoy the summer and feel free to contact me or anyone on our investment and wealth management teams to assist you.
Best regards,
Robert D. Rosenthal Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer
PS: From a historical standpoint, when the S&P 500 Index is up 12% or more in the first six months of the year, there is further happiness in the last six months of the year 79% of the time over the past 70 years! History is only a guide.
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed herein are those of Robert D. Rosenthal or First Long Island Investors, LLC (“FLI”), are for informational purposes, and are based on facts, assumptions, and understandings as of July 25, 2024 (the “Publication Date”). This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. This communication is not an offer to sell any securities or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any security and should not be construed as such. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Nothing herein should be construed as a recommendation to purchase any particular security. The companies and securities described herein may not be held in every (or any) FLI strategy at any given time. Investment returns will fluctuate over time, and past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This communication may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, in whole or in part, by any means, without written permission from FLI.
All performance data presented throughout this communication is net of fees, expenses, and incentive allocations through or as of June 30, 2024, as the case may be, unless otherwise noted. Past performance of FLI and its affiliates, including any strategies or funds mentioned herein, is not indicative of future results. Any forecasts included in this communication are based on the reasonable beliefs of Mr. Rosenthal or FLI as of the Publication Date and are not a guarantee of future performance. This communication may contain forward-looking statements, including observations about markets and industry and regulatory trends. Forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” or “estimates,” or the negatives of these terms, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements reflect the views of the author as of the Publication Date with respect to possible future events. Actual results may differ materially.
FLI believes the information contained herein to be reliable as of the Publication Date but does not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This communication is subject to modification, change, or supplement without prior notice to you. Some of the data presented in and relied upon in this document are based upon data and information provided by unaffiliated third-parties and is subject to change without notice.
NO ASSURANCE CAN BE MADE THAT PROFITS WILL BE ACHIEVED OR THAT SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES WILL NOT BE INCURRED.
First Long Island Investors, LLC was honored to host Natalie Karp, Founding Partner of Karp Loshak Long Term Care Insurance Solutions Brokerage, Inc., at the Garden City Hotel on May 8th for our semi-annual FLI Thought Leadership Breakfast. Karp Loshak, founded in 2008, serves as an independent broker affiliated with the leading Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance carriers. The firm is highly respected for their educational and consultative approach, which has been recognized as a resource by the Wall Street Journal and Newsday for their expertise on LTC insurance.
The conversation began with Natalie providing an overview of the current LTC landscape, emphasizing the escalating costs of care and the importance of proactively evaluating LTC insurance options. She positioned LTC insurance as a crucial financial planning tool designed to mitigate the exorbitant expenses associated with LTC and highlighted the diverse range of LTC insurance solutions available.
Natalie noted that LTC insurance is often overlooked because people are reluctant to confront the possibility of future care needs. However, ignoring this reality can lead to significant financial and emotional strain. She cited the high and rising cost of care and that the typical LTC need spans three years, which makes the need for LTC insurance more critical as life expectancies continue to increase. As a general guideline, Natalie mentioned that approximately 70% of individuals aged 70 years and older, and 80% of those reaching age 80, will require some level of LTC at some point.
FLI emphasizes the importance of considering LTC insurance for, quality of life, tax planning and estate preservation for suitable clients. LTC insurance provides tax-free benefits, helping preserve income and assets that would otherwise be depleted by care costs. Without LTC insurance, income reallocation or asset liquidation may trigger income taxes. Additionally, potential payroll tax implications loom, as nearly 30% of states have proposed imposing new mandatory payroll taxes on those who do not have private LTC coverage in order to fund the LTC burden on Medicaid. LTC premiums may be tax deductible for individuals, and corporations can benefit from tax advantages by paying premiums on behalf of employees.
The FLI Thought Leadership Breakfast series aims to provide our clients with access to industry thought leaders and experts who can provide valuable insights to help them make informed financial decisions. We were pleased to feature Natalie Karp as our guest speaker and remain committed to providing this level of expertise through future events. If you or your family have an interest in Long-Term Care Insurance, please do not hesitate to reach out to any of us here at FLI.
“Invest for the long haul. Don’t get too greedy and don’t get too scared.”
– Shelby M.C. Davis
The first quarter resulted in strong absolute returns for our defensive and traditional equity strategies. Most strategies have exceeded their respective benchmarks year-to-date. This follows a significant bounce back in 2023 in the wake of a very difficult 2022 for equity and fixed income markets. In fact, several of our strategies have exceeded the prior peak at year-end 2021, which reflected several years of large gains. So, when one invests for the long haul, as the above quote states, they should be rewarded when the emotions of greed or fear do not prevail. There is one exception, fixed income, which was about flat for the first quarter including interest, following 2023 where results were modestly higher, and 2022 when losses were incurred.
Early on, the first quarter continued to be led by a small number of large-cap growth companies, such that the Russell 1000 Growth Index outperformed the rival Russell 1000 Value Index. This can mostly be attributed to the disruption of artificial intelligence (AI) and its role in many growth companies. In addition, international investing, while positive, also underperformed its rival S&P 500 Index. We believe these positive results, led by growth companies, reflect reduced inflation, higher earnings, few prospects for recession, and a Fed that most recently indicated three interest rate cuts were being considered later in the year. Of note, in the past several weeks, we witnessed a broadening out of stocks achieving 52-week highs, many of which were outside the large-cap, technology-oriented companies. We are watching valuation very carefully, especially for the largest technology-oriented companies, where even the reference to AI has led to share price gains.
The following charts reinforce our view that there is some broadening out of the markets, inflation is trending down (although not yet at a level sought by the Fed), earnings growth estimates for the average large company (S&P 500 Index) continues to be positive for 2024, and employment (not pictured) continues to reflect a strong, although slowing, economy (not one headed for recession in 2024).
As the charts suggest from our consultant, Strategas Research Partners, the performance in the first quarter “rarely” suggests a market top.
It appears, for now, that the economy can constructively deal with the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury being in a range of 3.75% to 4.75% and inflation that has dropped to 2.8% for the core PCE (the Fed’s preferred inflation measure) while unemployment remains below 4% and GDP growth is forecasted to be approximately 2%. These factors contribute to the projected growth in corporate earnings and our belief that we will continue to grow our clients’ wealth, with a prudent asset allocation, over the course of this year. Anecdotally, our contacts in the real estate industry have also indicated that financial conditions in real-estate financing have finally improved. A note of optimism.
So, what can go wrong?
With two wars raging and a presidential-election year unfolding, we cannot afford to be complacent. The Middle Eastern war between Israel and Hamas (a proxy for Iran) could result in an escalation of hostilities. Already, the Houthis (another Iranian proxy) are attacking ships in the Red Sea, causing some havoc with global trade. This could result in an upturn in inflation. Of course, a growing conflict in the region with another Iranian proxy, Hezbollah in Lebanon, is simmering. Also, there is no end in sight to the war between Russia and Ukraine. American policy is being challenged politically in the case of both wars as well as the potential cost to the American taxpayer. Fortunately, these events have not been disruptive to our financial markets thus far.
The heating up of our domestic political environment is another concern. Illegal immigration across our southern border has reached a crisis. The influx of immigrants to sanctuary cities and elsewhere is also causing an economic strain. Immigration, crime, proposed major tax increases by the current administration, and women’s reproductive rights are all major issues that will be debated as the year goes on. This, of course, is on top of the embedded inflation that Americans are faced with despite the rate of inflation abating. Additionally, the collapse of the Francis Scott Key bridge in Baltimore could have a minor inflationary impact.
Historically, equity markets have performed reasonably well in the fourth year of a presidential term. To help that result, incumbent administrations have at their disposal the power to spend. In this year’s case, the President has the CHIPS and Science Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act at his disposal to help the economy along. Again, we have said, both last year and this year in our thought pieces that we do not see the prospects of a recession occurring during this election year. This is a positive, to be weighed along with the uncertainty of two presumptive nominees who, according to the polls, a majority of Americans view as unfavorable.
Summary
We are off to a very good start, which historically has resulted in good results for the year, but there are many moving parts domestically and a significant level of geopolitical uncertainty. Some level of optimism is based on the Fed reducing rates at some point during the year. If inflation does not continue to abate and the Fed does an about face, that would not be good for equity, fixed income, or real-estate markets. The same could be said, in our opinion, as it relates to private equity.
We remain cautiously optimistic given the propensity of what we have described above. However, we remain true to our cautious nature while still working to grow our clients’ wealth through an individualized, prudent asset allocation. One that reflects a broadening of company participants in the equity markets’ rise, that includes owning both value and growth-oriented companies (which continue to play a major role in stock market advances), and that does not just rely on AI (which we believe is positive and
disruptive). Fixed income, on a pre-inflation, pre-tax basis, will continue to play some role in our asset allocations for clients, but a mix of defensive and traditional equity investments will be the major allocations for most clients.
Enjoy the spring season! Please call upon us for any and all of your wealth management needs. Stay tuned as we see what evolves with both the President’s attempt to increase income and estate taxes as well as the sunsetting of the Trump tax cuts over the next two years.
Best regards,
Robert D. Rosenthal
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer
DISCLAIMERS
The views expressed herein are those of Robert D. Rosenthal or First Long Island Investors, LLC (“FLI”), are for informational purposes, and are based on facts, assumptions, and understandings as of April 25, 2024 (the “Publication Date”). This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. This communication is not an offer to sell any securities or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any security and should not be construed as such. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Nothing herein should be construed as a recommendation to purchase any particular security. The companies and securities described herein may not be held in every (or any) FLI strategy at any given time. Investment returns will fluctuate over time, and past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This communication may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, in whole or in part, by any means, without written permission from FLI.
All performance data presented throughout this communication is net of fees, expenses, and incentive allocations through or as of March 31, 2024, as the case may be, unless otherwise noted. Past performance of FLI and its affiliates, including any strategies or funds mentioned herein, is not indicative of future results. Any forecasts included in this communication are based on the reasonable beliefs of Mr. Rosenthal or FLI as of the Publication Date and are not a guarantee of future performance. This communication may contain forward-looking statements, including observations about markets and industry and regulatory trends. Forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” or “estimates,” or the negatives of these terms, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements reflect the views of the author as of the Publication Date with respect to possible future events. Actual results may differ materially.
FLI believes the information contained herein to be reliable as of the Publication Date but does not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This communication is subject to modification, change, or supplement without prior notice to you. Some of the data presented in and relied upon in this document are based upon data and information provided by unaffiliated third-parties and is subject to change without notice.
NO ASSURANCE CAN BE MADE THAT PROFITS WILL BE ACHIEVED OR THAT SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES WILL NOT BE INCURRED.
One Jericho Plaza, Suite 201, Jericho, NY 11753 T: 516-935-1200 // Copyright First Long Island Investors. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy // Terms of Use // Site Map // Disclosure
